Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Stroke Risk-Based Anticoagulation After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: ALONE-AF Post-Hoc Analysis

Heart RhythmPublished

  • post-hoc analysis of the Long-Term Anticoagulation Discontinuation after Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation (ALONE-AF) trial
  • exploratory
  • stratified by CHA2DS2-VASc score ≤2 and ≥3
  • Kaplan-Meier method
  • competing risk analysis accounting for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence
+4 more
  • exploratory
  • stratified by CHA2DS2-VASc score ≤2 and ≥3
  • Kaplan-Meier method
  • competing risk analysis accounting for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence

Authors' conclusion

In this exploratory post-hoc analysis, no statistically significant differences in outcomes were observed between OAC strategies when stratified by CHA2DS2-VASc score, though event numbers were limited. Larger prospective trials are needed to confirm these observations.

Study context

Population
840 ALONE-AF trial patients after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, stratified by CHA2DS2-VASc score (≤2 or ≥3)CHA2DS2-VASc score ≤2 (mean age 62.0±7.5 years, 15.9% female) 584 · CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥3 (mean age 68.9±7.3 years, 45.3% female) 256
Participants
840 patients
Comparison
Within each stratum, outcomes were compared between the oral anticoagulant (OAC) discontinuation and continuation subgroups.
Primary endpoint
Primary outcome:
  • Stroke
  • Systemic embolism
  • Major bleeding
Follow-up
2 years

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Primary outcome:
  • Stroke
  • Systemic embolism
  • Major bleeding
CHA2DS2-VASc ≤2 stratum
absolute difference −1.9 percentage points percentage points; P = 0.066
CHA2DS2-VASc ≥3 stratum; events occurred in the continuation subgroup only
absolute difference −1.8 percentage points percentage points; P = 0.172

Safety

Major bleeding

All major bleeding events occurred in the continuation subgroups
n=5

Original publication

Stroke Risk-Based Anticoagulation After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: ALONE-AF Post-Hoc Analysis. Heart Rhythm. Published 16 October 2026. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.10.009

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.