Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyRandomised controlled trial

Systematic, randomised atrial fibrillation screening using detailed phenotyping with a risk-prediction model combined with patch electrocardiogram in a Swedish population aged 65 years or older: The CONSIDERING-AF trial

EuropacePublished

  • Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

Among high-risk individuals ≥ 65 years, the combination of a machine learning-based RPM and long-term ECG recording was superior to standard care in identifying new AF cases.

Study context

Population
Individuals ≥ 65 years, Swedenparticipation 43% (632/1480) in invitation arms
Participants
2,960 individuals
Comparison
Atrial fibrillation (AF) screening with risk prediction model (RPM) + 14-day patch electrocardiogram (ECG) vs standard care
  • General + controln = 740reference
  • General + invitationn = 740
  • RPM + controln = 740
  • RPM + invitationn = 740
Primary endpoint
AF incidence (RPM + invitation vs general + control)
Follow-up
6 months

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Relative risk

5.6

95% CI 2.2–14.4

P < 0.001

Events by treatment group

RPM + invitation vs General + control
RR 5.6 (95% CI 2.2–14.4); P < 0.001

Further findings

OutcomeGeneral + controlGeneral + invitationRPM + controlRPM + invitationP value
AF incidence, other arm comparisons — RPM + invitation vs General + invitationNot reported in the abstract1.1%2.2%Not reported in the abstractP < 0.001
AF incidence, other arm comparisons — RPM + invitation vs RPM + controlP = 0.07
AF incidence, other arm comparisons — General + invitation vs General + control · no differenceP = 0.40

Original publication

Systematic, randomised atrial fibrillation screening using detailed phenotyping with a risk-prediction model combined with patch electrocardiogram in a Swedish population aged 65 years or older: The CONSIDERING-AF trial. Europace. Published 22 August 2025. doi:10.1093/europace/euaf190

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it