Valvular & structural heart diseaseCohort study

Tailoring Antiplatelet Therapy Duration After Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) Closure

JACC AdvPublished

  • multicenter retrospective registry
  • Inverse probability of treatment weighting

Authors' conclusion

In patients with a RoPE score ≥7, early discontinuation of APT after effective PFO closure was associated with a lower incidence of NACE at long-term follow-up.

Study context

Population
Patients who underwent PFO device closure between 1999 and 2013 at 12 Italian centers, with successful PFO closure, no significant residual shunt, and no other indication for long-term antithrombotic therapymean age 47 ± 12 years, 55% women, followed for 14.0 ± 3.1 years
Participants
940 patients
Exposure
Antiplatelet therapy (APT) discontinuation vs continuation after PFO closure
Outcome
NACE, a composite of ischemic events (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism) and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥3)
Follow-up
14.0 ± 3.1 years

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Adjusted hazard ratio

0.71

95% CI 0.38–1.37

P = 0.31

By group

APT discontinuation group vs APT continuation group
aHR 0.71 (95% CI 0.38–1.37); P = 0.31

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Ischemic events

OutcomeaHR (95% CI)P value
NACE by RoPE score (subgroup) · RoPE score ≥70.32 (0.11–0.90)P = 0.039
NACE by RoPE score (subgroup) · RoPE <71.07 (0.49–2.35)P = 0.89
  • Ischemic events: P = 0.66
  • Net adverse clinical events (NACE) by Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score (subgroup): P for interaction = 0.089

Safety

Major bleeding · lower in the APT discontinuation group

  • Major bleeding: P = 0.014

Original publication

Tailoring Antiplatelet Therapy Duration After PFO Closure. JACC Adv. Published 30 June 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.102943

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it