Coronary disease & ACSCohort study

Technical and Target Lesion Failure in Calcified Coronary Lesions

JACC AdvPublished

  • multicenter BENELUX-IVL registry

Authors' conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that residual risk in IVL-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention is driven by a distinct interplay of modifiable and nonmodifiable factors, rather than inherent limitations of the technology itself.

Study context

Population
Patients with calcified coronary lesions treated with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention, with complete quantitative coronary analysispatients (including 595 target lesions)
Participants
571 patients
Outcome
Technical failure (unsuccessful IVL delivery, residual stenosis >30%, or procedural complications); 12-month TLF (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization)
Follow-up
12-month (TLF)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Technical failure, lesions

60 (10.5%)

12-month target lesion failure (TLF), cases

41 (7.2%)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Independent determinants of technical failure (multivariable analysis)

ComparisonOR (95% CI)
multivessel disease1.39 (1.02–1.90)
in-stent lesions1.94 (1.14–3.30)
absence of intravascular imaging1.95 (1.13–3.40)

Factors independently associated with TLF

ComparisonHR (95% CI)
Left circumflex2.97 (1.49–5.92)
in-stent target lesions2.01 (1.02–3.52)
technical failure2.42 (1.26–4.61)
diabetes mellitus2.35 (1.23–4.47)
reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate0.98 (0.97–0.99)
younger age0.95 (0.92–0.98)

Original publication

Technical and Target Lesion Failure in Calcified Coronary Lesions. JACC Adv. Published 15 July 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.103010

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it