Coronary disease & ACSCohort study

Temporal Trends and Predictors of Access Site Crossover During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in Contemporary Practice: A Report From the NCDR CathPCI Registry

Circ Cardiovasc IntervPublished

  • Registry analysis

Authors' conclusion

In contemporary clinical practice, access site crossover rates are consistent with those reported in randomized trials. Although crossover occurs more frequently among lower-volume operators, rates decline with increasing operator experience, supporting the presence of a radial access learning curve and improvement in procedural performance over time.

Study context

Population
Index PCI procedures recorded in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry from 2018 to 2024
Participants
3,861,790 index PCIs

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Access site crossover

Index PCIs involving access site crossover

192 902 (5.0%)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Radial-to-femoral crossover share of crossover events

Radial-to-femoral crossover accounted for crossover events
81.2%

Factors independently associated with crossover

Older age, female sex, higher body mass index, and peripheral vascular disease

Crossover by operator volume

Operators with the lowest total PCI volume and the lowest radial PCI volume experienced the highest crossover rates
Operators with low radial PCI volume demonstrated a substantial decline in radial-to-femoral crossover over the study period

Original publication

Temporal Trends and Predictors of Access Site Crossover During PCI in Contemporary Practice: A Report From the NCDR CathPCI Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. Published 20 July 2026. doi:10.1161/circinterventions.126.016673

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it