Acute cardiac care & resuscitation

The effect of hand position on chest compression quality during CPR in young children: Findings from the Videography in Pediatric Resuscitation (VIPER) collaborative

ResuscitationPublished Prospective observational exploratory study

Authors' conclusion

In infants, 1H resulted in greater CC depth than 2 T. In children 1 to 8 yo, 2H resulted in greater depth than 1H..

Study context

Population
Patients < 8 years receiving chest compressions for > 2 minutes during CPR824 minutes of chest compression (CC)
Participants
47 patients
Exposure
Hand positions for chest compressions: 2 T vs 2F vs 1H vs 2H
Outcome
CC quality (CC rate and depth) by hand position, stratified by age category
Methodological detailsvideo review, CC monitor device
  • Video review
  • CC monitor device

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

CC depth by hand position
  • 1H vs 2 T: P < 0.01
  • 2H vs 1H: P < 0.001
  • Nonparametric univariate analysis

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Hand position use, infants < 1 yo (270 CC segments)

Outcome2 T2F1H2H
Hand position use, children 1 to 8 yo (189 CC segments)Not reported in the abstractNot reported in the abstract26%74%2 T, 2F: not reported in the abstract

CC rate and depth, all segments

Median CC rate, all segments (IQR 110-125)
117 cpm
Median depth, infants < 1 yo (IQR 2.44 - 4.04)
2.92 cm
Median depth, children 1 to 8 yo (IQR 2.92 - 4.14)
3.56 cm

Original publication

The effect of hand position on chest compression quality during CPR in young children: Findings from the Videography in Pediatric Resuscitation (VIPER) collaborative. Resuscitation. Published 16 February 2023. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109741

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.