Coronary disease & ACSCohort study

The Gulf Chronic Total Occlusion Registry

JACC AdvPublished

  • Registry
  • 7 tertiary centers in 4 Gulf countries

Authors' conclusion

After adjustment, no treatment strategy demonstrated superiority for hard cardiovascular outcomes; revascularization, particularly CABG, was associated with a lower angina burden at follow-up.

Study context

Population
Patients with angiographically confirmed chronic total occlusion (CTO), 2021–2023patients with angiographically confirmed CTO
Participants
741 patients
Exposure
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs medical therapy
  • medical therapyn = 151
  • PCIn = 441
  • CABGn = 149

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

In-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events · in-hospital
  • After adjustment, neither PCI nor CABG differed significantly from medical therapy
  • adjusted

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I · last follow-up — CABG vs medical therapy · significant · adjusted

P < 0.001

OutcomeP value
Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I · last follow-up — PCI vs medical therapy · not significant · adjustedP = 0.17

Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events-free survival · median follow-up of 22 months; 36-month restricted mean survival time

No statistically significant difference between PCI, CABG, and medical therapy
  • adjusted

Baseline characteristics by treatment

Medically managed patients had worse renal function, more severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and more cardiogenic shock despite simpler CTO anatomy
CABG patients had more extensive multivessel disease, whereas PCI patients had greater CTO lesion complexity

Original publication

The Gulf Chronic Total Occlusion Registry. JACC Adv. Published 6 August 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.103015

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it