Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyCohort study

The role for ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring in the diagnosis and prognostication of Brugada syndrome: a sub-study of the Rare Arrhythmia Syndrome Evaluation (RASE) Brugada study

EuropacePublished

  • Retrospective cohort study
  • sub-study of the RASE Brugada study
  • 1651 resting high precordial lead (HPL) and 621 ambulatory monitoring electrocardiogram (ECGs) reviewed

Authors' conclusion

Repeated ECG evaluation and HPL ambulatory monitoring are vital in identifying transient spT1 Brugada pattern and its associated risk.

Study context

Population
Brugada syndrome subjects with HPL resting and ambulatory monitoring ECGs
Participants
358 subjects
Exposure
spT1 pattern at presentation vs none
  • Group 1n = 77
  • Group 2n = 281reference
Outcome
Identification of spT1 on repeat HPL resting and ambulatory ECG, and its association with ventricular dysrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD)
Follow-up
Median 72 months

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

spT1 detection during follow-up · median 72 months (IQR 75)
GroupValueNewly detected spT1 ratespT1 on HPL ambulatory recording
Group 155%
Group 213%1.9 per 100 person-year23 (8%)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)P value
Arrhythmic events by spT1 — spT1 at presentation vs Group 2 · univariate6.3 (1.4–28)P = 0.016
Arrhythmic events by spT1 — spT1 at follow-up vs Group 2 · univariate3.1 (1.3–7.2)P = 0.008
Arrhythmic events by spT1 — Previously asymptomatic subjects with arrhythmic events (5 with spT1)
7

Original publication

The role for ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring in the diagnosis and prognostication of Brugada syndrome: a sub-study of the Rare Arrhythmia Syndrome Evaluation (RASE) Brugada study. Europace. Published 8 April 2024. doi:10.1093/europace/euae091

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it