Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Transseptal Transition Patterns During Left Bundle Branch Area Lead Implantation

JACC Clin ElectrophysiolPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

Capture of left bundle branch during lead penetration is a beat-to-beat phenomenon. Two transseptal transition patterns were identified: 1) sudden, which is typical for obtaining LBBP; and 2) gradual, which is typical for obtaining LVSP. A sudden COI drop, a very observable phenomenon, also identified reaching the left subendocardial area.

Study context

Population
Pacemaker recipients undergoing left bundle branch area lead implantationanalysed
Participants
212 recipients
Comparison
Sudden vs gradual transseptal transition pattern for diagnosing left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) vs LVSP
Outcome
Patterns of continuous QRS, ST-T and COI change for monitoring lead depth and determining capture type (LBBP vs LVSP)

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Diagnosis of LBBP
Test or modelValueSensitivitySpecificity
Sudden transition pattern80.7%98.8%81.2%

Sudden transition pattern

Value80.7%
Sensitivity98.8%
Specificity81.2%
LBBP obtained
77.4%
LVSP obtained
22.6%
Beat-to-beat phenomena, LBBP (mean ± SD)
4.7 ± 2.1
Beat-to-beat phenomena, LVSP (mean ± SD)
0.2 ± 0.6

Further findings

Patients with sudden current of injury (COI) drop
53.9%
COI before drop (mV)
29.4 ± 8.5
COI after drop (mV)
12.8 ± 4.9
LBBP simultaneously obtained
92.7%

Original publication

Transseptal Transition Patterns During Left Bundle Branch Area Lead Implantation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. Published 9 October 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2024.07.025

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.