Prevention & lipids

Travel Distance, Urbanicity, and Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation in Medicare Beneficiaries

JACC AdvPublished Retrospective cohort study

Main finding · CR enrollmentResult — go to the resultAdjusted difference −22.6 95% CI −23.1 to −22.0

Authors' conclusion

Increased travel distance was associated with lower overall CR participation, with the effect varying by local degree of urbanicity.

Study context

Population
Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with a recent CV procedure, July 2016–December 2018
Participants
501,049 beneficiaries
Exposure
Travel distance to nearest cardiac rehabilitation (CR) facility and urbanicity categories
  • Same zip coden = 118,642
  • 30+ milesn = 38,309
Outcome
CR enrollment (≥1 session) and completion (≥36 sessions)

Main finding

CR enrollment

Adjusted difference

−22.6

95% CI −23.1 to −22.0

P < 0.001

Events by group

30+ miles vs Same zip code
adjusted difference −22.6 (95% CI −23.1 to −22.0); P < 0.001

As reported in the abstract

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Distance to nearest CR facility, by urbanicity

  • Distance to nearest CR facility, by urbanicity: urban n = 84,345; rural n = 112,697

Effect of travel distance on CR enrollment and completion, rural vs urban

Effect of travel distance significantly greater in rural than urban areas

Original publication

Travel Distance, Urbanicity, and Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation in Medicare Beneficiaries. JACC Adv. Published 26 December 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102497

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.