Valvular & structural heart diseaseCohort study

Twenty-Year Follow-Up After Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Patients With Paradoxical Embolism

JAMA CardiolPublished

  • Cohort study
  • single-centre
  • prospective procedure and early follow-up data collection
  • retrospective long-term follow-up
  • consecutive patients

Authors' conclusion

The results of this cohort study with 20-year follow-up showed the sustained very long-term safety and efficacy of transcatheter PFO closure, with less than 1% rate of recurrent stroke events. However, bleeding events occurred in about 1 in 10 patients and were more frequent in women and in patients under long-term antithrombotic therapy.

Study context

Population
Patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure for cryptogenic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or peripheral embolism, 2001–2006, tertiary university hospitalfollow-up incomplete in 5
Participants
130 patients
Outcome
Long-term clinical outcomes:
  • Medical record review
  • Telephone interviews
Follow-up
20 years

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Death and recurrent ischemic events · 20-year follow-up

All-cause death

20 patients (15.3%)

Noncardiovascular death

12.2%

Recurrent stroke

1 stroke [0.04 per 100 patients, per year]

Recurrent TIA

6 TIAs [0.25 per 100 patients, per year]

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeP value
Thrombophilia prevalence, recurrent ischemic event vs none · 33% vs 4.8%P = 0.04

Discontinued antithrombotic treatment

Up to 20.5% discontinued antithrombotic treatment; none had an ischemic event

Safety

Bleeding events · 20-year follow-up

Any bleeding
17 patients (13%)
Major bleeding
9 cases (6.9%)
Bleeding, women vs men
19.4% vs 6.3%; P = .03
Bleeding, long-term antithrombotic therapy vs discontinued
17% vs 0%; P = .04

Original publication

Twenty-Year Follow-Up After Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Patients With Paradoxical Embolism. JAMA Cardiol. Published 1 April 2026. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2026.0020

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it