Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyRandomised controlled trial

Very high-power short-duration using 70W and a flexible tip ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation: the POWER PULSE randomized controlled trial

EuropacePublished

  • Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

Very high-power short-duration with 70 W/5-7 s was non-superior to standard ablation regarding acute PV reconnection and 12-month freedom from any atrial arrhythmia.

Study context

Population
Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing pulmonary vein isolationrandomised 1:1
Participants
200 patients
Comparison
vHPSD-70W vs standard ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)
Primary endpoint
Number of reconnected pulmonary veins (rPV) after adenosine testing

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Number of rPVs

vHPSD-70W

0.6

mean · SD 0.8

Standard

0.8

mean · SD 0.9

P = 0.145

Secondary outcomes

Bilateral first-pass isolation

P = 0.072

First-pass isolation of left PVs

P = 0.042

Freedom from any atrial arrhythmia · 12 months

P = 0.171

Atrial tachycardia recurrence · 12 months

P = 0.005

Procedure duration

P < 0.001

Radiofrequency duration

P < 0.001

Safety

Silent cerebral lesions (SCLs)

SCLs, vHPSD-70W vs standard
1/25 (4.0%) vs. 3/22 (13.6%)
  • P = 0.328

Original publication

Very high-power short-duration using 70W and a flexible tip ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation: the POWER PULSE randomized controlled trial. Europace. Published 21 July 2025. doi:10.1093/europace/euaf105

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it