Acute cardiac care & resuscitation

Assessing both early and late EEG patterns improves prediction of outcome after cardiac arrest

ResuscitationPublished Secondary analysis of the TTM2 randomised trial

Authors' conclusion

Searching for both early EEG predictors (e.g. identical burst-suppression) and late EEG predictors (e.g. heterogenous burst-suppression > 24 h) significantly improved sensitivity of poor outcome prediction without false positive survivors in this cohort.

Study context

Population
Consecutive comatose resuscitated patients after cardiac arrest53 % poor outcome
Participants
191 participants
Comparison
Early EEG predictors vs late EEG predictors vs both for outcome prediction
Primary endpoint
Prediction of poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale 4-6)
Follow-up
Six months
Methodological detailsobservational substudy, blinded EEG assessment
  • Observational substudy
  • Blinded EEG assessment

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Poor outcome prediction
GroupMaximal sensitivity (before 24 h)Maximal sensitivitySensitivity (up to 36 h after cardiac arrest (CA))Specificity (all time-points)Specificity (beyond 24 h)
Early EEG predictors30 %[CI 21-40]Not reported in the abstractNot reported in the abstract100 %[CI 96-100]Not reported in the abstract
Late EEG predictorsNot reported in the abstract32 %[CI 21-43]Not reported in the abstractNot reported in the abstract100 %[CI 96-100]
Early and late EEG predictorsNot reported in the abstractNot reported in the abstract49 %[CI 39-59]Not reported in the abstractNot reported in the abstract

Maximal sensitivity (before 24 h)

Early EEG predictors30 %[CI 21-40]
Late EEG predictorsNot reported in the abstract
Early and late EEG predictorsNot reported in the abstract

Maximal sensitivity

Early EEG predictorsNot reported in the abstract
Late EEG predictors32 %[CI 21-43]
Early and late EEG predictorsNot reported in the abstract

Sensitivity (up to 36 h after cardiac arrest (CA))

Early EEG predictorsNot reported in the abstract
Late EEG predictorsNot reported in the abstract
Early and late EEG predictors49 %[CI 39-59]

Specificity (all time-points)

Early EEG predictors100 %[CI 96-100]
Late EEG predictorsNot reported in the abstract
Early and late EEG predictorsNot reported in the abstract

Specificity (beyond 24 h)

Early EEG predictorsNot reported in the abstract
Late EEG predictors100 %[CI 96-100]
Early and late EEG predictorsNot reported in the abstract

Further findings

Continuous background within 12 h predicting good outcome

Sensitivity
61 %[CI 50-71]
Specificity
87 %[CI 79-93]

Original publication

Assessing both early and late EEG patterns improves prediction of outcome after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. Published 7 August 2025. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110762

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.