Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Association between surrogate insulin resistance markers and postablation atrial fibrillation recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Heart RhythmPublished systematic review and meta-analysis

Pooled result · AF recurrence, triglyceride-glucose indexResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 1.29 95% CI 1.15–1.44

Authors' conclusion

Surrogate markers of insulin resistance can be valuable predictors for assessing the risk of AF recurrence in patients who have undergone catheter ablation, potentially aiding in preventive strategies. Nevertheless, further prospective studies are required to validate our findings.

Study context

Population
Patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing ablation
Participants
7,729 patients · 9 studies
Comparison
Surrogate insulin resistance markers and postablation AF recurrence
Outcome
AF recurrence, triglyceride-glucose index
Methodological detailsobservational studies, random-effects model, Newcastle-Ottawa scale risk of bias, leave-one-out sensitivity analysis
  • Observational studies
  • Random-effects model
  • Newcastle-Ottawa scale risk of bias
  • Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Hazard ratio

1.29

95% CI 1.15–1.44

Triglyceride-glucose index
HR 1.29 (95% CI 1.15–1.44)

Further pooled results

AF recurrence, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance

ComparisonHR (95% CI)
Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistanceI2 = 0%1.27 (1.14–1.42)

AF recurrence, metabolic score for insulin resistance

ComparisonHR (95% CI)
Metabolic score for insulin resistanceI2 = 0%1.04 (1.03–1.05)

AF recurrence, triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio

ComparisonHR (95% CI)
Triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein ratioI2 = 86%; not statistically significant1.09 (0.96–1.24)

Original publication

Association between surrogate insulin resistance markers and postablation atrial fibrillation recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm. Published 27 April 2025. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.04.050

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.