Aortic & peripheral vascular disease
Atherectomy Is Not Associated With Improved Limb-Based Outcomes Among Patients in the BEST-CLI Trial Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization
Primary result · MALEResult — go to the resultAdjusted hazard ratio 1.30 95% CI 0.92–1.84Authors' conclusion
Atherectomy was associated with similar or slightly worse limb-based outcomes among patients undergoing endovascular revascularization for CLTI compared with other available endovascular technologies.
Study context
- Population
- Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) treated with endovascular revascularization in the BEST-CLI trial
- Participants
- 923 patients
- Comparison
- Endovascular revascularization with vs without atherectomy
- Atherectomyn = 132
- Primary endpoint
- Major adverse limb events (MALE):
- Major reintervention
- Above-ankle amputation in the index limb
Methodological detailsprospective
- Prospective
Primary result
MALE
Adjusted hazard ratio
1.30
95% CI 0.92–1.84
Atherectomy vs No atherectomy
aHR 1.30 (95% CI 0.92–1.84)
As reported in the abstract
Secondary outcomes
| Outcome | Estimate | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Major reintervention | aHR for major reintervention 1.07 (95% CI 0.67–1.73) | ||
| Above-ankle amputation | aHR for above-ankle amputation 1.32 (95% CI 0.81–2.15) | ||
| All-cause death | aHR for all-cause death 1.06 (95% CI 0.75–1.49) | ||
| Major adverse limb events in patients with technical success (sensitivity analysis)P is unadjusted log-rank; higher MALE with atherectomy | aHR for MALE (major reintervention or above-ankle amputation) 1.51 (95% CI 1.03–2.22) | P = 0.02 | |
| 0.512Ratio (log scale) |
- Major adverse limb events in patients with technical success (sensitivity analysis): sensitivity analysis limited to patients with technical success
Original publication
Atherectomy Is Not Associated With Improved Limb-Based Outcomes Among Patients in the BEST-CLI Trial Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 12 January 2026. doi:10. 1016/ j. jcin. 2025. 10. 065
Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it