Aortic & peripheral vascular disease

Atherectomy Is Not Associated With Improved Limb-Based Outcomes Among Patients in the BEST-CLI Trial Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished Secondary analysis of the BEST-CLI randomised trial

Primary result · MALEResult — go to the resultAdjusted hazard ratio 1.30 95% CI 0.92–1.84

Authors' conclusion

Atherectomy was associated with similar or slightly worse limb-based outcomes among patients undergoing endovascular revascularization for CLTI compared with other available endovascular technologies.

Study context

Population
Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) treated with endovascular revascularization in the BEST-CLI trial
Participants
923 patients
Comparison
Endovascular revascularization with vs without atherectomy
  • Atherectomyn = 132
Primary endpoint
Major adverse limb events (MALE):
  • Major reintervention
  • Above-ankle amputation in the index limb
Methodological detailsprospective
  • Prospective

Primary result

MALE

Adjusted hazard ratio

1.30

95% CI 0.92–1.84

Atherectomy vs No atherectomy
aHR 1.30 (95% CI 0.92–1.84)

As reported in the abstract

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeEstimateP value
Major reinterventionaHR for major reintervention 1.07 (95% CI 0.67–1.73)
Above-ankle amputationaHR for above-ankle amputation 1.32 (95% CI 0.81–2.15)
All-cause deathaHR for all-cause death 1.06 (95% CI 0.75–1.49)
Major adverse limb events in patients with technical success (sensitivity analysis)P is unadjusted log-rank; higher MALE with atherectomyaHR for MALE (major reintervention or above-ankle amputation) 1.51 (95% CI 1.03–2.22)P = 0.02
  • Major adverse limb events in patients with technical success (sensitivity analysis): sensitivity analysis limited to patients with technical success

Original publication

Atherectomy Is Not Associated With Improved Limb-Based Outcomes Among Patients in the BEST-CLI Trial Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 12 January 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2025.10.065

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.