Valvular & structural heart disease

Audiovisual Distraction During Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: A Sedation-Sparing Randomized Trial

JACC AdvPublished prospective randomized controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

AVD with video glasses is a safe, pragmatic adjunct to conscious sedation in M-TEER that reduces propofol requirements and improves patient-reported comfort and satisfaction without compromising procedural efficiency or in-hospital safety. (Does audiovisual distraction reduce the need for analgesic sedation and increase patient satisfaction in patients undergoing mitral valve clipping? A randomized controlled trial; DRKS00037370).

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) under conscious sedationpatients randomized 1:1
Participants
60 patients
Comparison
Audiovisual distraction (AVD) vs sham control
Primary endpoint
Mean propofol dose (mg/kg/h)
Methodological details1:1 allocation, sham control, uniform blinded sedation protocol
  • 1:1 allocation
  • Sham control
  • Uniform blinded sedation protocol

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

P = 0.002

Secondary outcomes

Norepinephrine use · numerically lower

P = 0.08

OutcomeAVDSham controlP value
Postprocedural anxiety · reduced with AVDmean 1.1 ± 1.0mean 2.5 ± 1.7P = 0.001
Satisfaction · improved with AVDmean 24.7 ± 3.0mean 22.5 ± 2.8P = 0.005

Procedural duration, hemodynamic fluctuations, and hospital length of stay

Similar

Original publication

Audiovisual Distraction During Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: A Sedation-Sparing Randomized Trial. JACC Adv. Published 21 May 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.102835

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.