Automated vessel-specific coronary artery calcification quantification with deep learning in a large multi-centre registry
Authors' conclusion
Vessel-specific CAC assessment with DL can be performed accurately and rapidly on gated CT and AC CT and provides important prognostic information.
Study context
- Population
- Patients undergoing gated computed tomography (CT) or attenuation correction (AC) CT in a large multi-centre registryDeep learning (DL) trained on 3000 gated CT
- Participants
- 2,094 vs 5,969
- Comparison
- Automated DL vessel-specific coronary artery calcification (CAC) vs expert ground truth
- Gated CTn = 2,094
- AC CTn = 5,969
- Outcome
- Vessel-specific agreement (linear weighted Cohen's Kappa) between DL and expert ground truth for CAC categories (zero, 1-100, 101-400, >400 Agatston units (AU)) in LM/LAD, LCX and RCA
Methodological detailsmulticentre, registry
- Multicentre
- Registry
Performance
As reported in the abstract
| Test or model | LM/LAD Kappa | Left circumflex (LCX) Kappa | Right coronary artery (RCA) Kappa |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gated CT | 0.90 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.92) | 0.70 (0.68 to 0.73) | 0.79 (0.77 to 0.81) |
| AC CT | 0.78 (0.77 to 0.80) | 0.60 (0.58 to 0.62) | 0.70 (0.68 to 0.71) |
LM/LAD Kappa
Gated CT0.90 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.92)
AC CT0.78 (0.77 to 0.80)
Left circumflex (LCX) Kappa
Gated CT0.70 (0.68 to 0.73)
AC CT0.60 (0.58 to 0.62)
Right coronary artery (RCA) Kappa
Gated CT0.79 (0.77 to 0.81)
AC CT0.70 (0.68 to 0.71)
Further findings
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) · 2.4 ± 1.4 years follow-up
| Gated CT | AC CT | HR (95% CI) | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LM/LAD CAC >400 AUGated CT; highest risk of MACE | 12% | 14% | 12.0 (7.96–18.0) | P < 0.001 | |
| LM/LAD CAC >400 AUAC CT; highest risk of MACE | 4.21 (3.48–5.08) | P < 0.001 | |||
| 0.050.21520Hazard ratio (log scale) |
Original publication
Automated vessel-specific coronary artery calcification quantification with deep learning in a large multi-centre registry. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. Published 20 February 2024. doi:10. 1093/ ehjci/ jeae045
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →