Hypertension

Care gaps following newly detected dipstick proteinuria in treated hypertension: a Japanese nationwide database study

Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin OutcomesPublished Japanese nationwide database study

Authors' conclusion

Follow-up quantitative testing and RASi initiation after newly detected dipstick proteinuria were infrequent, even among patients with higher dipstick grades, and RASi initiation showed no clear improvement over time. These findings highlight opportunities to improve guideline-concordant urinary protein assessment and antihypertensive therapy.

Study context

Population
Treated hypertensive patients with newly detected dipstick proteinuria (≥1+, with prior results <1+) between January 2005 and March 2025overall population, 14,599 baseline renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) non-users · baseline RASi non-users 14,599
Participants
47,210 patients
Exposure
2+ proteinuria vs 3+ proteinuria
Outcome
Quantitative urine albumin/protein testing, cumulative incidence
Follow-up
365 days
Methodological detailsJMDC claims database
  • JMDC claims database

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Overall population (n = 47 210)

7.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.2-7.7]

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Outcome2+ proteinuria3+ proteinuria
Quantitative testing and RASi initiation by dipstick grade
Quantitative testing12.916.1%
RASi initiation17.521.7%

RASi initiation, cumulative incidence · 365 days

Baseline RASi non-users (n = 14 599)
13.2% (95% CI: 12.6-13.8)
  • Kaplan-Meier method

Quantitative testing and RASi initiation by dipstick grade

Both outcomes became more frequent with increasing dipstick grade but remained infrequent in the higher-grade groups

Temporal trend in RASi initiation

aHR per year
1.01; 95% CI: 0.99-1.03
RASi initiation rates showed no improvement

Original publication

Care gaps following newly detected dipstick proteinuria in treated hypertension: a Japanese nationwide database study. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. Published 19 September 2026. doi:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcag144

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.