Coronary disease & ACS

Characterizing high-risk enrollment criteria and impact on clinical outcomes in a large randomized clinical trial: Insights from the TWILIGHT trial

Am Heart JPublished posthoc analysis

Authors' conclusion

In the TWILIGHT trial, the high-risk features correlated more strongly with ischemic than with bleeding risk. Nonetheless, the benefits of ticagrelor compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin were consistent, irrespective of the number of high-risk features. These findings are only applicable to patients who are event-free at 3 months after PCI.

Study context

Population
High-risk patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and were event-free at 3 months, enrolled in the TWILIGHT trialpatients analysed by number of high-risk criteria
Participants
7,119 patients
Comparison
Ticagrelor monotherapy vs ticagrelor plus aspirin
Outcome
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, by number of risk factors

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

ticagrelor monotherapy vs ticagrelor plus aspirinHazard ratio (95% CI)
≤ 3-RF: 3.5% vs 5.8%
0.59(0.38–0.93)
4-RF: 3.7% vs 6.4%
0.57(0.37–0.86)
5-RF: 3.8% vs 8.6%
0.44(0.29–0.66)
≥ 6-RF: 5.3% vs 7.9%
0.65(0.44–0.96)

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeTicagrelor monotherapyTicagrelor plus aspirinHR (95% CI)
Composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (key secondary), by number of risk factors · within 1 year after randomization≤ 3-RF1.6%2.1%0.75 (0.38–1.50)
Composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (key secondary), by number of risk factors · within 1 year after randomization4-RF3.5%2.2%1.58 (0.91–2.75)
Composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (key secondary), by number of risk factors · within 1 year after randomization5-RF4.1%5.0%0.80 (0.51–1.24)
Composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (key secondary), by number of risk factors · within 1 year after randomization≥ 6-RF6.7%6.9%0.98 (0.67–1.43)
  • Composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (key secondary), by number of risk factors: p-interaction = .22

Proportion of patients fulfilling ≤ 3, 4, 5, or ≥ 6 risk factors

≤ 3 risk factors
21.5%
4 risk factors
32.7%
5 risk factors
27.4%
≥ 6 risk factors
18.4%

Most prevalent enrollment criteria

Troponin-positive acute coronary syndrome (ACS), most prevalent clinical criterion
64.9%
Multivessel disease (MVD), most prevalent angiographic criterion
66.5%
Most frequent intersection: troponin-positive ACS, atherosclerotic vascular disease, MVD, left main or proximal anterior descending lesion, and stent length > 30 mm

Ischemic and bleeding risk by number of high-risk criteria

Stepwise increase in ischemic but not in bleeding risk with an increasing number of high-risk criteria

Original publication

Characterizing high-risk enrollment criteria and impact on clinical outcomes in a large randomized clinical trial: Insights from the TWILIGHT trial. Am Heart J. Published 30 January 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2025.01.016

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.