Heart failure & cardiomyopathies

Comparison of Cardiovascular Outcomes of New Antihyperglycemic Agents in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis

ESC Heart FailPublished Meta-analysis

Authors' conclusion

SGLT2i is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death, HHF, death from any cause, and MI in patients with T2DM compared with GLP1-RA. In addition, SGLT2i brought more benefits with respect to the effects of cardiovascular death, HHF, and death from any cause in patients with HF, regardless of diabetes status.

Study context

Population
T2DM patients with CV risk; patients with heart failure (HF) regardless of diabetes status38 studies
Comparison
SGLT2i vs GLP1-RA in T2DM; SGLT2i vs control in HF
Outcome
CV outcomes, SGLT2i vs GLP1-RA (T2DM)

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

SGLT2i vs GLP1-RARelative risk (95% CI)
HHF
0.77(0.74–0.80)
Death from any cause
0.64(0.60–0.68)
MI
0.81(0.76–0.87)
CV death; CI as printed (does not contain estimate)
RR 0.59 (95% CI 0.44–0.58)

Further pooled results

OutcomeRR (95% CI)
CV death, HHF, death from any cause in HF, SGLT2i vs controlCV death (reduced by 14%) · regardless of diabetes status0.86 (0.79–0.94)
CV death, hospitalization of heart failure (HHF), death from any cause in HF, SGLT2i vs control — HHF risk reduced
25%
CV death, HHF, death from any cause in HF, SGLT2i vs control — Death from any cause risk reduced
9%

Safety

OutcomeRR (95% CI)
Stroke, SGLT2i vs GLP1-RAIncreased risk1.10 (1.04–1.17)

Original publication

Comparison of Cardiovascular Outcomes of New Antihyperglycemic Agents in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis. ESC Heart Fail. Published 28 February 2024. doi:10.1002/ehf2.14726

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.