Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Concomitant leadless pacing in pacemaker-dependent patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction for active infection: Mid-term follow-up

Heart RhythmPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Leadless pacing is a safe and efficacious approach for the management of patients with pacing requirements that undergo CIED extraction in the setting of active infection.

Study context

Population
Pacemaker-dependent patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for active cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, June 2018–September 2022
Participants
86 patients
Outcome
Clinical outcomes
Follow-up
Median 163 days (IQR 57-403 days)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Procedure-related complications
0
Recurrent infections
0
Deaths
25 (29%)
Deaths unrelated to initial infection
22 (88%)
Deceased with MRSA or Candida infection
9 (36%)
Persistent infection despite TLE among these
3

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Evidence of bacteremia
65 (76%)
Discharged to complete antimicrobial treatment (of bacteremic)
80%

Safety

No procedure-related complications

Original publication

Concomitant leadless pacing in pacemaker-dependent patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction for active infection: Mid-term follow-up. Heart Rhythm. Published 9 February 2023. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.02.003

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.