Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Transvenous lead extraction safety and efficacy in infected and noninfected patients using mechanical-only tools: Prospective registry from a high-volume center

Heart RhythmPublished Prospective registry study

Authors' conclusion

TLE is safe and successfully performed in most patients, with a low major complication rate.

Study context

Population
Consecutive patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction, 2016–2022 (EXTRACT Registry)
Participants
504 patients
Exposure
Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) infection vs non-CIED infection
Outcome
Periprocedural clinical and procedural success; major complications including death
Follow-up
30 days
Methodological detailssingle high-volume centre, consecutive patients, mechanical-only tools
  • Single high-volume centre
  • Consecutive patients
  • Mechanical-only tools

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) success

Complete procedural success

474

94.0%

Clinical success

492

97.6%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Predictors of any major complication incl. death in 30 days

CIED infection: NYHA class IV and pre-procedure C-reactive protein independent predictors
Non-CIED infection: time since last preceding procedure and pre-procedure platelet count independent predictors

Complications and procedural death

Major complications
16 (3.2%)
Minor complications
51 (10%)
Died during procedure
3 (0.6%)

Original publication

Transvenous lead extraction safety and efficacy in infected and noninfected patients using mechanical-only tools: Prospective registry from a high-volume center. Heart Rhythm. Published 28 December 2023. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.12.015

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.