Coronary computed tomography angiography versus invasive coronary angiography for interventional triage in acute coronary syndrome: Design of the randomized TRACTION trial
Study context
- Population
- Patients hospitalised with NSTEMI or unstable angina with ischaemic ECG changes (non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS))planned enrolment
- Participants
- 2,300 patients
- Planned comparison
- Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for interventional triage
- Primary endpoint
- MACE: all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, hospitalisation for refractory angina or for HF
- Follow-up
- 1 year
Methodological detailsTRACTION, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, 1:1 randomisation
- TRACTION
- Multicentre
- Open-label
- Non-inferiority
- 1:1 randomisation
No results yet. This paper sets out the design of a trial; its results are to come.
Original publication
Coronary computed tomography angiography versus invasive coronary angiography for interventional triage in acute coronary syndrome: Design of the randomized TRACTION trial. Am Heart J. Published 6 December 2025. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →