Acute cardiac care & resuscitationRandomised controlled trial

Deferring Arterial Catheterization in Critically Ill Patients with Shock

N Engl J MedPublished

  • Randomised controlled trial
  • multicentre
  • open-label
  • non-inferiority

Authors' conclusion

Among patients with shock, results for death from any cause at day 28 indicated that management without early arterial catheter insertion was noninferior to early catheter insertion.

Study context

Population
Patients with shock admitted to an ICU within the past 24 hours
Participants
504 vs 502
Comparison
Noninvasive BP monitoring vs early arterial catheter insertion
  • Noninvasive strategyn = 504
  • Invasive strategyn = 502reference
Primary endpoint
Death from any cause (non-inferiority margin 5 percentage points)
Follow-up
Day 28

Primary result

Death from any cause · 28 days

Adjusted risk difference

−3.2 percentage points

95% CI −8.9 to 2.5

P = 0.006 for non-inferiority

Events by treatment group

Noninvasive strategy vs Invasive strategy
adjusted risk difference −3.2 percentage points (95% CI −8.9 to 2.5); P for non-inferiority = 0.006

As reported in the abstract

Further findings

Arterial catheter insertion

Safety

≥1 day of pain or discomfort related to the BP-monitoring device

Hematoma or hemorrhage related to the arterial catheter

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Deferring Arterial Catheterization in Critically Ill Patients with Shock. N Engl J Med. Published 29 October 2025. doi:10.1056/nejmoa2502136

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it