Coronary disease & ACS

Study design for an emulated trial of a 2 arm, parallel, stratified, adaptive, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in people requiring myocardial revascularization at high risk (High-Risk REVASC)

Am Heart JPublished Study design for an emulated trial

Study context

Population
Patients who require multivessel myocardial revascularization with at least one high-risk characteristic: age >75 years, female, diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, or intermediate frailty risk
Planned comparison
CABG versus PCI in high-risk patients
Methodological detailsroutinely collected health data, trial emulation methodology, latent class analysis, instrumental variable analysis
  • Routinely collected health data
  • Trial emulation methodology
  • Latent class analysis
  • Instrumental variable analysis

No results yet. This paper sets out the design of a trial; its results are to come.

Original publication

Study design for an emulated trial of a 2 arm, parallel, stratified, adaptive, RCT of CABG versus PCI in people requiring myocardial revascularization at high risk (High-Risk REVASC). Am Heart J. Published 2 February 2026. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107368

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.