Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Device-Assisted vs Standard Valsalva Maneuver for Terminating Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMA CardiolPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary result · Conversion to sinus rhythm within 1 minute after 2 VMsResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 4.16 95% CI 2.36–7.47

Authors' conclusion

Per the results of this randomized clinical trial, the handheld Valsalva assist device significantly enhances VM effectiveness, providing a potentially implementable solution for SVT management.

Study context

Population
Patients with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) (aged 16–80 years) undergoing electrophysiological study, induced SVT, tertiary hospital210 in primary analysis
Participants
212 patients
Comparison
Device-assisted Valsalva maneuver (VM) vs standard VM
  • Device-assisted VMn = 106
  • Standard VMn = 106reference
Primary endpoint
Immediate cardioversion success (12-lead ECG-confirmed sinus rhythm within 1 minute) postintervention
Follow-up
Within 1 minute
Methodological detailssingle-centre, open-label
  • Single-centre
  • Open-label

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Conversion to sinus rhythm within 1 minute after 2 VMs

Odds ratio

4.16

95% CI 2.36–7.47

P < 0.001

Events by treatment group

Device-assisted VM vs Standard VM
OR 4.16 (95% CI 2.36–7.47); P < 0.001

Original publication

Device-Assisted vs Standard Valsalva Maneuver for Terminating Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. Published 1 March 2026. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2025.5489

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.