Coronary disease & ACS

Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive cardiac imaging modalities in patients with a history of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis

HeartPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

Authors' conclusion

In patients with prior CAD, CCTA, CCTA+CTP and CMR demonstrated high diagnostic performance, whereas SPECT had lower sensitivity.

Study context

Population
Patients with prior MI or PCI (populations with ≥50% prior coronary artery disease (CAD)); invasive reference standards
Participants
3,265 patients18 studies
Comparison
Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) vs CCTA+CTP vs cardiac MRI (CMR) vs single-photon emission CT (SPECT) for detecting obstructive CAD
Outcome
Per-patient diagnostic performance for obstructive CAD (sensitivity, specificity, AUC)
Methodological detailsprospective, blinded studies, Searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, 2005 to September 2022
  • Prospective, blinded studies
  • Searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, 2005 to September 2022

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Per-patient diagnostic accuracy for obstructive CAD
GroupAUCSensitivitySpecificity
CCTA0.91 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.98)0.95 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.98)0.37 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.46)
CCTA+CTP0.89 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.00)0.93 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.98)0.59 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.69)
CMR0.91 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.00)0.91 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.94)0.69 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.81)
SPECT0.70 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.87)0.63 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.73)0.66 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.76)

AUC

CCTA0.91 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.98)
CCTA+CTP0.89 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.00)
CMR0.91 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.00)
SPECT0.70 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.87)

Sensitivity

CCTA0.95 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.98)
CCTA+CTP0.93 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.98)
CMR0.91 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.94)
SPECT0.63 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.73)

Specificity

CCTA0.37 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.46)
CCTA+CTP0.59 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.69)
CMR0.69 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.81)
SPECT0.66 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.76)
Obstructive CAD prevalence
64%

Original publication

Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive cardiac imaging modalities in patients with a history of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Heart. Published 23 August 2024. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324248

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.