Valvular & structural heart disease

Echocardiographic and clinical features of patients developing prosthesis‐patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Insights from the Recovery-TAVR registry

Am Heart JPublished Retrospective analysis of a multicentre observational registry

Authors' conclusion

PPM was observed in 18% of patients undergoing TAVR. Echocardiographic evaluations demonstrated a PPM-related pattern of early ventricular maladaptive alterations, possibly precursor to a reduction in cardiac function, associated with a significant deterioration in NYHA class at 1 year.

Study context

Population
Patients at intermediate and low surgical risk undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), 2017–2021 (RECOVERY-TAVR registry)
Participants
963 patients
Exposure
Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) vs no PPM after TAVR
Outcome
Prevalence and predictors of PPM; impact on mortality and clinical-echocardiographic progression of heart damage
Follow-up
1 year
Methodological detailsinternational
  • International

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Prevalence of PPM

PPM after TAVR

18%

Severe PPM (whole cohort)

7.7%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Moderate-severe paravalvular AR · predischarge

P < 0.01

LV end-systolic diameter · 1 year

P = 0.03

Predictors of PPM

OR (CI)P value
Prosthesis size≤23 mmIndependent predictor11.6 (1.68–80.1)
SViProtective0.87 (0.83–0.91)P < 0.001
LVOT diameterProtective0.79 (0.65–0.95)P = 0.01
OutcomePPMNo PPMP value
LV end-systolic indexed volume (moderate and severe PPM vs none) · 1 year— not stated in the abstract44 (IQR 35–59)P = 0.02
NYHA III-IV (moderate/severe PPM vs none) · 1 year— not stated in the abstract7.8%P = 0.03

— not stated in the abstract

  • LV end-systolic indexed volume (moderate and severe PPM vs none): Moderate PPM 52 (IQR 42–64)
  • LV end-systolic indexed volume (moderate and severe PPM vs none): Severe PPM 52 (IQR 41–64)
  • NYHA III-IV (moderate/severe PPM vs none): Moderate/severe PPM 13%

Overall and CV mortality

No significant impact of PPM on overall mortality
P = 0.71
No significant impact of PPM on CV mortality
P = 0.70

Original publication

Echocardiographic and clinical features of patients developing prosthesis‐patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Insights from the Recovery-TAVR registry. Am Heart J. Published 3 June 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.015

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.