Acute cardiac care & resuscitation

Efficacy of supraglottic airway devices in chest compression synchronized ventilation during continuous resuscitation: a prospective randomized cross-over cadaver study

ResuscitationPublished Randomised crossover cadaver study

Primary result · Reaching target pCCSV corridorResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 1.87 95% CI 0.91–3.83

Authors' conclusion

SGA were associated with a lower likelihood of reaching the target range of pCCSV, lower Vte, and higher Vleak. Regardless the airway device, CCSV-failure is possible emphasizing the need for vigilant respiratory monitoring.

Study context

Population
Adult Thiel-embalmed cadavers
Participants
11 participants
Comparison
Tracheal intubation (TI) vs SGA
Primary endpoint
Achieving pCCSV = 40 ± 3 mbar
Methodological detailsprospective, cross-over
  • Prospective
  • Cross-over

Primary result

Reaching target pCCSV corridor

Odds ratio

1.87

95% CI 0.91–3.83

P = 0.0864

TI vs SGA
OR 1.87 (95% CI 0.91–3.83); P = 0.0864

As reported in the abstract

Ventilated with all airway types
2 (18 %)
Ventilated only with TI
3 (27 %)
Not sufficiently ventilated with any device incl. TI
2 (18 %)

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeEstimateP value
pCCSV, Vte and Vleak, TI vs SGATI vs SGA · pCCSVregression coefficient 2.99 mbar (95% CI 1.63–4.35)P < 0.0001
pCCSV, Vte and Vleak, TI vs SGATI vs SGA · Vteregression coefficient 42.42 ml (95% CI 32.07–52.27)P < 0.0001
pCCSV, Vte and Vleak, TI vs SGATI vs SGA · Vleakregression coefficient −55.03 % (95% CI −62.92-47.15)P < 0.0001
pCCSV among individual SGAAmbu®AuraGain™ vs I-GEL®regression coefficient −2.58 mbar (95% CI −4.04--1.13)P = 0.0006
pCCSV among individual SGAAmbu®AuraGain™ vs LTS-D®regression coefficient −1.73 mbar (95% CI −3.18--0.27)P = 0.0204
pCCSV among individual SGALTS-D® vs I-GEL®regression coefficient −0.86 mbar (95% CI −2.30-0.59)P = 0.2434

Original publication

Efficacy of supraglottic airway devices in chest compression synchronized ventilation during continuous resuscitation: a prospective randomized cross-over cadaver study. Resuscitation. Published 2 September 2025. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110795

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.