Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting

N Engl J MedPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary resultResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 0.98 95% CI 0.87–1.10

Authors' conclusion

In our trial, the rate of the composite outcome of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, renal failure, or repeat revascularization at 5 years of follow-up was similar among patients who underwent off-pump CABG and those who underwent on-pump CABG.

Study context

Population
Patients with CAD undergoing coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG)
Participants
4,752 patients
Comparison
Off-pump vs on-pump CABG
Primary endpoint
Composite of:
  • Death
  • Stroke
  • MI
  • Renal failure
  • Repeat coronary revascularization (CABG or PCI)
Follow-up
5 years (mean 4.8 years)
Methodological detailsmulticentre (19 countries)
  • Multicentre (19 countries)

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Hazard ratio

0.98

95% CI 0.87–1.10

P = 0.72

By group

Off-pump vs On-pump
HR 0.98 (95% CI 0.87–1.10); P = 0.72

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeOff-pumpOn-pumpHR (95% CI)P value
Repeat coronary revascularization2.8%2.3%1.21 (0.85–1.73)P = 0.29

Mean $, U.S. dollars

OutcomeOff-pumpOn-pumpBetween-group difference (U.S. dollars) (95% CI)
Mean cost per patient (overall trial period)15,10714,992$115 (-$697 to $927)

Other components of the composite outcome

No significant differences in the rates of the components of the outcome

Quality of life

No significant between-group differences in quality-of-life measures

Original publication

Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting. N Engl J Med. Published 23 October 2016. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1601564

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.