Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Hemolysis and kidney injury after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Microsecond vs nanosecond pulsed field ablation

Heart RhythmPublished Observational study

Authors' conclusion

PFA for atrial fibrillation typically induced hemolysis; however, the application-related dose effect was observed in microPFA, but not in nanoPFA. NanoPFA was associated with lower hemolysis indices, whereas severe anemia and AKI may be rare. Larger studies are needed to confirm modality differences, define clinical impact, and optimize application titration.

Study context

Population
Patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablationpatients included
Participants
323 patients
Exposure
Hemolysis and acute kidney injury (AKI) after microPFA, nanoPFA, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
  • microPFAn = 186
  • nanoPFAn = 65
  • RFAn = 72
Outcome
Hemolysis
Methodological detailssingle high-volume Chinese center
  • Single high-volume Chinese center

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

  • Pulsed field ablation (PFA) produced obvious hemolysis, which was not observed with RFA
  • Postablation bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and free hemoglobin increased and haptoglobin decreased with PFA

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomemicroPFAnanoPFAP value
LDH · postablationmicroPFA vs nanoPFA · higher with microPFA · after multivariable adjustment229.0 ± 50.6 IU/L198.4 ± 33.8 IU/LP < 0.001
Free hemoglobin · postablationmicroPFA vs nanoPFA · higher with microPFA · after multivariable adjustment289.3 ± 45.1 ng/mL263.7 ± 55.0 ng/mLP = 0.043

Hemolysis vs delivery number (microPFA)

LDH ratio r
0.26; 95% confidence interval 0.10-0.40
Bilirubin ratio r
0.15; 95% confidence interval 0-0.29
No dose-dependent association was detected with nanoPFA

Safety

Hemoglobin decline and hemoglobin drop of >20 g/L

Hemoglobin decline

Hemoglobin drop of >20 g/L

Events

OutcomemicroPFAnanoPFARFA
AKIAKI was uncommon310

Original publication

Hemolysis and kidney injury after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Microsecond vs nanosecond pulsed field ablation. Heart Rhythm. Published 31 March 2026. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.03.1941

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.