Prevention & lipids

Identifying People at High Risk for Severe Aortic Stenosis: Aortic Valve Calcium Versus Lipoprotein(a) and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Circ Cardiovasc ImagingPublished Prospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

AVC better identifies people at high risk for severe AS compared with Lp(a) or LDL-C, and people with AVC=0 have a very low long-term rate of severe AS regardless of Lp(a) or LDL-C level.

Study context

Population
MESA participants with CT-quantified aortic valve calcification (AVC), Lp(a) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at visit 1 (2000–2002); mean age 62 years, 47% women
Participants
6,792 participants
Exposure
AVC >0 vs AVC=0, by Lp and LDL-C levels
Outcome
Incident adjudicated severe AS
Follow-up
median 16.7-year follow-up

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Incident severe AS

AVC=0

Rate with Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL
<0.1/1000 person-years
Rate with LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL
0.1/1000 person-years

AVC=0

Rate with Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL<0.1/1000 person-years
Rate with LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL0.1/1000 person-years
AVC >0 vs AVC=0Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Lp(a) <50 mg/dL
33.8(16.4–70.0)
Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL
61.5(7.7–494.2)
LDL-C <130 mg/dL
31.1(14.4–67.1)
LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL
50.2(13.2–191.9)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Original publication

Identifying People at High Risk for Severe Aortic Stenosis: Aortic Valve Calcium Versus Lipoprotein(a) and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. Published 18 June 2024. doi:10.1161/circimaging.123.016372

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.