Heart failure & cardiomyopathies

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Contemporary Heart Failure Patients: An Analysis From the EMPEROR-Reduced Trial

JACC Heart FailPublished Secondary analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced randomised trial

Authors' conclusion

In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction enrolled in EMPEROR-Reduced, those with an ICD (vs non-ICD) experienced a lower risk of SCD regardless of empagliflozin treatment.

Study context

Population
Patients with HFrEF enrolled in EMPEROR-Reduced, on placebo or empagliflozinmatched cohort
Participants
1,674 patients
Comparison
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) vs no ICD
  • ICDn = 837
  • Non-ICDn = 837reference
Primary endpoint
Sudden cardiac death (SCD)
Methodological detailspropensity-score matched
  • Propensity-score matched

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

ICD vs Non-ICDHazard ratio (95% CI)
Empagliflozin arm
0.59(0.26–1.3)
Placebo arm
0.31(0.13–0.74)

Original publication

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Contemporary Heart Failure Patients: An Analysis From the EMPEROR-Reduced Trial. JACC Heart Fail. Published 2 July 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2026.103166

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.