Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Inappropriate therapies in modern implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A propensity score–matched comparison between single- and dual-chamber discriminators in single-chamber devices THe sINGle lead Study (THINGS Study)

Heart RhythmPublished Prospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

High-rate VF cutoff and prolonged detection time programming resulted in a low IT rate in single-lead ICD patients with modern SVT discriminators. A trend favoring the DC system was observed in the VT zone.

Study context

Population
Patients with single-lead implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) (median age 66 years; 83% male)median follow-up 2.2 years
Participants
526 patients
Exposure
Dual-chamber vs single-chamber SVT discrimination in single-lead ICDs
  • Dual chamber (DC)n = 183
  • Single chamber (SC)n = 343reference
Outcome
First occurrence of inappropriate therapy, adjudicated by an independent board
Methodological detailspropensity-score matched comparison, 2-zone programming: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) zone from 170 beats/min, ≥15 s (≥36 beats) detection with SVT discriminators; Ventricular fibrillation (VF) zone from 214 beats/min, ≥7 s (≥24 beats) detection
  • Propensity-score matched comparison
  • 2-zone programming: VT zone from 170 beats/min, ≥15 s (≥36 beats) detection with SVT discriminators; VF zone from 214 beats/min, ≥7 s (≥24 beats) detection

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Incidence of inappropriate therapy (all patients)

IT incidence at 1 year

4.2%

95% CI 2.7%–6.4%

IT incidence at 2 years

7.1%

95% CI 5.0%–9.9%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Predictors of IT

Adjusted HR (95% CI)P value
Age (younger age associated with increased IT risk)0.97 (0.95–0.99)P = 0.013
History of AF2.67 (1.30–5.46)P = 0.007

IT in VT zone, DC vs SC · 1 year · trend toward reduced IT with DC · propensity score-matched comparison

P = 0.105

Original publication

Inappropriate therapies in modern implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A propensity score–matched comparison between single- and dual-chamber discriminators in single-chamber devices THe sINGle lead Study (THINGS Study). Heart Rhythm. Published 5 October 2024. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.10.004

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.