Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesSecondary analysis

Incremental Prognostic Value of Biomarkers in PARADIGM-HF

Eur J Heart FailPublished

  • Secondary analysis of the PARADIGM-HF randomised trial
  • prognostic biomarker analysis

Authors' conclusion

None of the biomarkers studied individually or collectively led to a meaningful improvement in the prediction of outcomes over what is provided by clinical, routine laboratory, and natriuretic peptide variables.

Study context

Population
HF patients in PARADIGM-HF with biomarker measurements
Participants
1,559 patients
Comparison
PREDICT-HF prognostic model with vs without candidate biomarkers
Primary endpoint
Improvement in PREDICT-HF model performance (discrimination, reclassification) for the primary endpoint, CV and all-cause mortality
Follow-up
Mean 30.7 months

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Incremental prognostic value of biomarkers over PREDICT-HF
  • Individually, only high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), GDF-15, cystatin C and TIMP-1 independently associated with all outcomes
  • All biomarkers added together: only hs-TnT independent predictor of all three endpoints; GDF-15 also predictive of primary endpoint; TIMP-1 the only other predictor of CV and all-cause mortality
  • No significant improvement in discrimination or reclassification, individually or in combination

Further findings

Events during follow-up · mean follow-up 30.7 months

Patients with primary outcome
300
Deaths
197

Original publication

Incremental Prognostic Value of Biomarkers in PARADIGM-HF. Eur J Heart Fail. Published 4 June 2023. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2887

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it