Coronary disease & ACS

Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus: Rationale and design of an international, multicenter, randomized IVI-DIABETES trial

Am Heart JPublished investigator-initiated, prospective, international, multicenter, randomized trial

Study context

Population
Diabetic patients with obstructive coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)planned enrolment
Participants
1,332 patients
Planned comparison
Intravascular imaging (IVI)- guided PCI or angiography- guided PCI
Primary endpoint
target vessel failure (TVF), defined by the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization
Follow-up
12 months
Methodological detailsat least 30 sites, 1:1 randomization, rationale and design (no results)
  • At least 30 sites
  • 1:1 randomization
  • Rationale and design (no results)

No results yet. This paper sets out the design of a trial; its results are to come.

Original publication

Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus: Rationale and design of an international, multicenter, randomized IVI-DIABETES trial. Am Heart J. Published 4 February 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2025.01.017

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.