Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Leadless atrial versus transvenous pacing for sinus node dysfunction: 1-year outcomes from the leadless ARRIVE real-world study

EuropacePublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

AVEIR AR was associated with fewer long-term complications and reinterventions compared with DCTV and RATV, while 1-year mortality remained similar.

Study context

Population
Medicare patients with de novo AVEIR AR leadless pacemakers (LP) or transvenous (TV) pacemaker implantation, January 2024 to March 2025
Participants
428 / 39,881 / 389
Exposure
AVEIR AR leadless atrial pacemaker vs dual-chamber or right-atrial transvenous pacemakers
  • AVEIR ARn = 428
  • DCTVn = 39,881reference
  • RATVn = 389reference
Outcome
30-day complications and 1-year outcomes (complications, device-reinterventions, all-cause mortality)
Follow-up
30 days and 1 year
Methodological detailspropensity score overlap weighting, Medicare fee-for-service claims
  • Propensity score overlap weighting
  • Medicare fee-for-service claims

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Complications

AVEIR AR

30-day complications vs DCTV (adjusted)
6.7%
30-day complications vs RATV
6.9%
1-year complications vs DCTV
3.6%
1-year complications vs RATV
3.3%

DCTV

30-day complications (adjusted)
9.4%
1-year complications
8.5%

RATV

30-day complications
6.7%
1-year complications
7.5%

30-day complications vs DCTV (adjusted)

AVEIR AR6.7%
DCTVNot reported in the abstract
RATVNot reported in the abstract

30-day complications vs RATV

AVEIR AR6.9%
DCTVNot reported in the abstract
RATVNot reported in the abstract

1-year complications vs DCTV

AVEIR AR3.6%
DCTVNot reported in the abstract
RATVNot reported in the abstract

1-year complications vs RATV

AVEIR AR3.3%
DCTVNot reported in the abstract
RATVNot reported in the abstract

30-day complications (adjusted)

AVEIR ARNot reported in the abstract
DCTV9.4%
RATVNot reported in the abstract

1-year complications

AVEIR ARNot reported in the abstract
DCTV8.5%
RATV7.5%

30-day complications

AVEIR ARNot reported in the abstract
DCTVNot reported in the abstract
RATV6.7%
AVEIR AR vs DCTV · 30-day complications
OR 0.7
AVEIR AR vs DCTV · 1-year complications
HR 0.4
AVEIR AR vs RATV · 1-year complications
HR 0.4

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Device-related complications and reinterventions · 1 year

Device-related complications reduced vs DCTV
Reinterventions reduced vs both DCTV and RATV

All-cause mortality · 1 year

Mortality comparable across all groups

Original publication

Leadless atrial versus transvenous pacing for sinus node dysfunction: 1-year outcomes from the leadless ARRIVE real-world study. Europace. Published 14 April 2026. doi:10.1093/europace/euag072

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.