Coronary disease & ACS

Long-Term Outcomes After Fractional Flow Reserve vs Intravascular Ultrasound to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): The FLAVOUR Trial Extended Follow-Up

J Am Coll CardiolPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary resultResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 1.15 95% CI 0.93–1.42

Authors' conclusion

FFR-guided and IVUS-guided treatment strategies resulted in comparable long-term outcomes, with no significant difference in patient-oriented composite outcomes.

Study context

Population
Patients aged ≥19 years with de novo intermediate coronary stenosis (40%-70%) and target vessel diameters ≥2.5 mm
Participants
1,682 patients
Comparison
Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided vs intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided treatment
  • FFRn = 838
  • IVUSn = 844reference
Primary endpoint
Composite of:
  • All-cause death
  • MI
  • Any revascularization after the index procedure
Follow-up
Median 6.3 years (Q1-Q3: 5.6-6.9 years)
Methodological detailsopen-label, multinational, 18 sites in Korea and China, extended follow-up
  • Open-label
  • Multinational
  • 18 sites in Korea and China
  • Extended follow-up

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

median 6.3 years

Hazard ratio

1.15

95% CI 0.93–1.42

P = 0.208

Events by treatment group

FFR vs IVUS
HR 1.15 (95% CI 0.93–1.42); P = 0.208

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeFFRIVUSHR (95% CI)P value
Revascularization after index procedure14.9%11.8%1.32 (1.00–1.75)P = 0.049
Target vessel revascularization9.6%6.2%1.67 (1.15–2.43)P = 0.007

Overall target vessel PCI (index and follow-up)

P < 0.001

  • Revascularization after index procedure: driven primarily by late (2-7 years) revascularizations in vessels with initially deferred PCI

Death or MI

No statistically significant differences in annual cumulative incidence of death or MI between groups

Original publication

Long-Term Outcomes After Fractional Flow Reserve vs Intravascular Ultrasound to Guide PCI: The FLAVOUR Trial Extended Follow-Up. J Am Coll Cardiol. Published 26 August 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.06.042

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.