Coronary disease & ACS

Negative Predictive Value and Prognostic Associations of Rb-82 PET/CT with Myocardial Blood Flow in Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV)

JACC Heart FailPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

An algorithm using PET/CT scanning with MBF demonstrates high a negative predictive value for CAV. PET CAV 2/3 is associated with a higher risk of adverse events and need for revascularization.

Study context

Population
Heart transplant recipients without prior revascularization who underwent PET/CT with myocardial blood flow (MBF)88 diagnostic, 401 prognostic
Exposure
PET/CT with MBF vs invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for CAV screening
Outcome
Diagnostic accuracy for moderate to severe CAV by ICA (PET/CT within 1 year of ICA); prognostic composite of HF hospitalization, MI, retransplantation and all-cause mortality

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Moderate to severe CAV by ICA
GroupPPVNPV
PET CAV 0— not stated in the abstract97%
PET CAV 2/368%— not stated in the abstract

PPV

PET CAV 0— not stated in the abstract
PET CAV 2/368%

NPV

PET CAV 097%
PET CAV 2/3— not stated in the abstract

— not stated in the abstract

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Annualized adverse event rate (HF hospitalization, MI, retransplantation, all-cause mortality) · median 1.2 (IQR: 1.0-1.8) years

P < 0.001

Annualized adverse event rate (HF hospitalization, MI, retransplantation, all-cause mortality) — Patients with an adverse event
46

Original publication

Negative Predictive Value and Prognostic Associations of Rb-82 PET/CT with Myocardial Blood Flow in CAV. JACC Heart Fail. Published 11 January 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2022.11.012

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.