Prevention & lipids

Predictive Accuracy of a Polygenic Risk Score Compared With a Clinical Risk Score for Incident Coronary Heart Disease

JAMAPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

In this analysis of 2 cohorts of US adults, the polygenic risk score was associated with incident coronary heart disease events but did not significantly improve discrimination, calibration, or risk reclassification compared with conventional predictors.

Study context

Population
US adults of white European ancestry aged 45–79 years in Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), 1996–2015
Participants
4,847 vs 2,390
Exposure
PCE plus polygenic risk score vs PCE alone
  • ARICn = 4,847
  • MESAn = 2,390
Outcome
Prediction of first coronary heart disease (CHD) events (MI, fatal coronary events, silent infarctions, revascularization, resuscitated cardiac arrest): discrimination, calibration, NRI
Follow-up
10-year
Methodological details2 cohorts (ARIC, MESA)
  • 2 cohorts (ARIC, MESA)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Prediction of 10-year CHD: PCE + polygenic risk score vs PCE
ARIC
change in C statistic −0.001 (95% CI −0.009 to 0.006)
MESA
change in C statistic 0.021 (95% CI −0.0004 to 0.043)
ARIC · at 10-year risk threshold of 7.5%
Net reclassification improvement (NRI) 0.018 (95% CI −0.012 to 0.036)
MESA · at 10-year risk threshold of 7.5%
NRI 0.001 (95% CI −0.038 to 0.076)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)
Association of polygenic risk score with 10-year CHD incidence (HR per SD increment)ARIC · per SD increment1.24 (1.15–1.34)
Association of polygenic risk score with 10-year CHD incidence (HR per SD increment)MESA · per SD increment1.38 (1.21–1.58)

Incident CHD events · median follow-up 15.5 years (ARIC), 14.2 years (MESA)

Original publication

Predictive Accuracy of a Polygenic Risk Score Compared With a Clinical Risk Score for Incident Coronary Heart Disease. JAMA. Published 18 February 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.21782

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.