Heart failure & cardiomyopathies

Pressure-Dimension Index and Left Ventricular Sphericity Index Following HeartMate II and HeartMate 3 implantation

ESC Heart FailPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

The design of HM3 offered better geometrical preservation of the LV and enabled normal PDI values, leading to improved RV function, as indicated by better RVFAC, TAPSE, and TASV values.

Study context

Population
Patients implanted with HeartMate II or HeartMate 3, 2012–2020, with echocardiography pre-operatively, at 6 and 12 months post-operativelymean follow-up 24 ± 7 months
Participants
46 patients
Exposure
HM3 vs HMII LVAD
  • HM3n = 24
  • HMIIn = 22reference
Outcome
Changes in left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) geometry and performance (echocardiography)
Follow-up
12 months post-operatively

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

RV and LV echocardiographic parameters
GroupValueRV fractional area change (RVFAC)Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)Tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TASV)LV sphericity index (LVSI)
HM335 ± 12 %35 ± 12%13.9 ± 1.9 mm11.5 ± 2.7 mm/s0.8 ± 0.2
HMII26 ± 16 %26 ± 16%12.0 ± 2.1 mm9.9 ± 1.5 mm/s1.2 ± 0.4

Value

HM335 ± 12 %
HMII26 ± 16 %

RV fractional area change (RVFAC)

HM335 ± 12%
HMII26 ± 16%

Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)

HM313.9 ± 1.9 mm
HMII12.0 ± 2.1 mm

Tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TASV)

HM311.5 ± 2.7 mm/s
HMII9.9 ± 1.5 mm/s

LV sphericity index (LVSI)

HM30.8 ± 0.2
HMII1.2 ± 0.4
  • HM3 vs HMII: P = 0.039 — RVFAC
  • HM3 vs HMII: P = 0.002 — TAPSE
  • HM3 vs HMII: P = 0.020 — TASV
  • HMII vs HM3: P = 0.001 — LVSI higher with HMII

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Pre-operative pressure-dimension index (PDI) as predictor of post-operative right ventricular failure (RVF)

OR (95% CI)P value
Pre-operative PDIOnly predictor in univariate and multivariate analyses3.84 (1.53–18.16)P = 0.022
OutcomeP value
2-year survival · log-rank; better with HM3P = 0.042
Pre-operative PDI as predictor of post-operative RVF — AUC for pre-operative PDI
0.912

LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), pre-operative vs 12 months post-operatively

HMII: 6.4 ± 1.4 cm vs 5.7 ± 0.9 cm
P = 0.040
HM3: 6.7 ± 1.3 cm vs 5.5 ± 0.9 cm
P < 0.01

PDI in HM3, baseline vs 12 months · 12 months post-operatively

3.4 ± 1.4 mmHg/cm² vs 2.0 ± 0.8 mmHg/cm²
P < 0.001

Original publication

Pressure-Dimension Index and Left Ventricular Sphericity Index Following HeartMate II and HeartMate 3 implantation. ESC Heart Fail. Published 5 June 2024. doi:10.1002/ehf2.14839

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.