Prevention & lipids

Prevalence and Correlates of Lipoprotein(a) Testing in a Diverse Cohort of U.S. Adults

JACC AdvPublished real-world, diverse sample

Authors' conclusion

The prevalence of Lp(a) testing among US adults is exceedingly low, especially for non-Hispanic Black individuals and those with socioeconomic risk. These results underline the importance of emphasizing health equity in Lp(a) testing expansion.

Study context

Population
Participants ≥18 years of age from the All of Us Research Study who shared electronic medical record information through 2022participants who shared electronic medical record information through 2022
Participants
266,612 participants
Comparison
Association of demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical variables with Lp(a) testing
Outcome
Lp(a) testing

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Underwent Lp(a) testing

2,172

0.8%

Of those tested, had clinical cardiovascular disease

86%

Further findings

OutcomeOR (95% CI)
Lp(a) testing by race and ethnicity32% lower odds · multivariable logistic regression0.68 (0.58–0.81)

Lp(a) testing by socioeconomic factors

OR (95% CI)
Less than high school education0.34 (0.25–0.44)
Unemployment0.76 (0.68–0.85)
Disability0.77 (0.65–0.91)

Lp(a) testing by clinical factors

OR (95% CI)
non-Lp(a) lipid abnormality5.64 (4.72–6.79)
Prevalent cardiovascular disease3.21 (2.76–3.74)
Lp(a) testing by socioeconomic factors — lower odds of Lp(a) testing
23% to 66%

Baseline characteristics

Mean age
52 years
Women
61%
non-Hispanic White
53%

Original publication

Prevalence and Correlates of Lipoprotein(a) Testing in a Diverse Cohort of U.S. Adults. JACC Adv. Published 30 May 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101826

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.