Valvular & structural heart disease

Prognostic Impact of Discharge Transprosthetic Tricuspid Gradient After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement: The TRIPLACE Registry

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished international, multicenter transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) registry

Authors' conclusion

Elevated dTVG after TTVR independently identifies patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes. A 3.5 mm Hg threshold may support postprocedural risk stratification, whereas inner valve diameter represents a potentially modifiable determinant of elevated dTVG. (TRIPLACE [Global Multicenter Registry on Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement]; NCT06033274).

Study context

Population
Patients after transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR), excluding those with in-hospital mortality, lack of TTVR technical success, missing dTVG, or unavailable follow-upincluded among 526 patients
Participants
474 patients
Exposure
dTVG ≥3.5 mm Hg vs lower dTVG
  • dTVG ≥3.5 mm Hgn = 122
Outcome
All-cause mortality
Follow-up
1 and 3 years
Methodological detailsdischarge landmark analysis
  • Discharge landmark analysis

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

dTVG ≥3.5 mm Hg vs dTVG <3.5 mm HgEstimate (95% CI)P value
1 year
HR 2.07(1.14–3.75)
P = 0.017
3 years
HR 2.07(1.24–3.48)
P = 0.006
3 years, multivariable adjustment
adjusted HR 1.84(1.09–3.10)
P = 0.022

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeEstimateP value
Composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization · 1 and 3 yearsdTVG ≥3.5 mm Hg vs dTVG <3.5 mm Hg · 1 yearHR 1.99 (95% CI 1.31–3.03)P = 0.001
Composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization · 1 and 3 yearsdTVG ≥3.5 mm Hg vs dTVG <3.5 mm Hg · 3 yearsHR 1.96 (95% CI 1.33–2.88)P < 0.001
Composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization · 1 and 3 yearsdTVG ≥3.5 mm Hg vs dTVG <3.5 mm Hg · 1 year, multivariable adjustmentadjusted HR 1.77 (95% CI 1.16–2.70)P = 0.009
Composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization · 1 and 3 yearsdTVG ≥3.5 mm Hg vs dTVG <3.5 mm Hg · 3 years, multivariable adjustmentadjusted HR 1.77 (95% CI 1.20–2.60)P = 0.004
Predictor of high dTVG: indexed inner transcatheter tricuspid valve diameterOnly potentially modifiable independent predictorOR 0.79 (95% CI 0.71–0.88)

Prevalence of high dTVG · discharge

dTVG cutoff of 3.5 mm Hg identified patients with high dTVG
122 of 474 patients (25.7%)
  • Data-driven cutoff

Original publication

Prognostic Impact of Discharge Transprosthetic Tricuspid Gradient After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement: The TRIPLACE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 31 October 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2026.10.010

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.