Acute cardiac care & resuscitation

Prothrombin Complex Concentrate vs Frozen Plasma for Coagulopathic Bleeding in Cardiac Surgery: The FARES-II Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMAPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary result · Hemostatic effectivenessResult — go to the resultDifference 17.6% 95% CI 8.7%–26.4%

Authors' conclusion

In this unblinded randomized clinical trial, PCC had superior hemostatic efficacy and safety advantages to frozen plasma among patients requiring coagulation factor replacement for bleeding during cardiac surgery.

Study context

Population
Adults undergoing cardiac surgery with bleeding related to coagulation factor deficiency after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass420 in primary analysis
Participants
538 adults
Comparison
4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) vs frozen plasma
  • PCCn = 265
  • Frozen plasman = 263reference
Primary endpoint
Hemostatic response (effective if no hemostatic interventions from 60 min to 24 h after treatment initiation)
Follow-up
24 hours
Methodological detailsunblinded, non-inferiority, multicentre (12 hospitals, Canada and US)
  • Unblinded
  • Non-inferiority
  • Multicentre (12 hospitals, Canada and US)

Primary result

Hemostatic effectiveness

Difference

17.6%

95% CI 8.7%–26.4%

P < 0.001

Events by treatment group

PCC vs Frozen plasma
difference 17.6% (95% CI 8.7%–26.4%); P < 0.001

Non-inferiority margin 10 as printed, not drawn

As reported in the abstract

Secondary outcomes

OutcomePCCFrozen plasmaDifference (95% CI)P value
Transfusions (RBC, platelets, noninvestigational frozen plasma units) · fewer with PCCmean 6.6 (95% CI 5.7–7.7) unitsmean 9.3 (95% CI 8.0–10.8) units2.7 (1.0–4.4)P = 0.002

Safety

OutcomePCCFrozen plasmaRR (95% CI)P value
Serious adverse events36.2%47.3%0.76 (0.61–0.96)P = 0.02
AKI10.3%18.8%0.55 (0.34–0.89)P = 0.02

Original publication

Prothrombin Complex Concentrate vs Frozen Plasma for Coagulopathic Bleeding in Cardiac Surgery: The FARES-II Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. Published 27 May 2025. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.3501

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.