Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

The randomized controlled trial to compare temporary permanent pacemaker vs temporary pacemaker in patients with conduction block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Rationale and design of the RECOVER trial

Am Heart JPublished prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study

Study context

Population
Patients with conduction block during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure or within 1 month after TAVR (persistent third-degree atrioventricular block (AVB), second-degree AVB, first-degree AVB with symptoms (PR interval >300 ms), alternating bundle branch block or bifascicular block with syncope/blackness related symptoms)planned enrolment, 14 enrolled as of January 1, 2025
Participants
160 patients
Planned comparison
Temporary permanent pacemaker (TPPM) vs TM in patients with conduction block after TAVR
Methodological details13 sites in China, design paper; enrolment ongoing
  • 13 sites in China
  • Design paper; enrolment ongoing

No results yet. This paper sets out the design of a trial; its results are to come.

Further findings

Trial status · January 1, 2025

Enrolled
14
  • The trial is still enrolling participants

Original publication

The randomized controlled trial to compare temporary permanent pacemaker vs temporary pacemaker in patients with conduction block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Rationale and design of the RECOVER trial. Am Heart J. Published 19 April 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2025.04.017

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.