Aortic & peripheral vascular disease

Randomized Trial Comparing a Stent-Avoiding With a Stent-Preferred Strategy in Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary result · Primary patencyResult — go to the resultRR for primary patency (SA vs SP) 0.995 95% CI 0.818–1.210

Authors' conclusion

Both endovascular strategies promoting lesion preparation before the use of drug-eluting devices suggest promising efficacy and safety results in complex femoropopliteal procedures with a high proportion of total occlusions through 12 months.

Study context

Population
Patients with symptomatic complex femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford 2–4, mean lesion length 187.7 ± 78.3 mm, 79.2% total occlusions)
Participants
120 patients
Comparison
Stent-avoiding vs stent-preferred strategy
Primary endpoint
Primary patency
Follow-up
12 months
Methodological detailsprospective, multicentre, pilot study, 1:1 randomisation, Lesion preparation incl. plaque modification/removal devices at operators' discretion in both arms
  • Prospective
  • Multicentre
  • Pilot study
  • 1:1 randomisation
  • Lesion preparation incl. plaque modification/removal devices at operators' discretion in both arms

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

RR for primary patency (stent-avoiding (SA) vs stent-preferred (SP))

0.995

95% CI 0.818–1.210

P = 1.0

Events by treatment group

SAvs SP
RR for primary patency (SA vs SP) 0.995 (95% CI 0.818–1.210); P = 1.0

Further findings

Lesion preparation performed

P = 0.038

Provisional stenting (SA)
48.3% · 29 events

Safety

OutcomeSASPRR for freedom from major adverse events (SA vs SP) (95% CI)P value
Freedom from major adverse events · 12 months93.1%94.9%0.981 (0.895–1.075)P = 0.717
  • Freedom from major adverse events: all adverse events attributable to clinically driven target lesion revascularization

Original publication

Randomized Trial Comparing a Stent-Avoiding With a Stent-Preferred Strategy in Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 13 May 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2024.03.015

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.