Rationale and design of the multicentric randomized EVAOLD trial: Evaluation of a strategy guided by imaging versus routine invasive strategy in elderly patients with ischemia
Study context
- Population
- NSTEMI patients ≥80 years of ageplanned sample size 1,756
- Planned comparison
- Selective invasive strategy guided by ischaemia stress imaging vs routine invasive strategy
- Primary endpoint
- Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE):
- All-cause death
- Nonfatal MI
- Nonfatal stroke
- Follow-up
- 1 year
Methodological detailsmulticentre, prospective, open-label, 2 parallel arms, non-inferiority, Geriatric assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis also planned
- Multicentre
- Prospective
- Open-label
- 2 parallel arms
- Non-inferiority
- Geriatric assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis also planned
No results yet. This paper sets out the design of a trial; its results are to come.
Original publication
Rationale and design of the multicentric randomized EVAOLD trial: Evaluation of a strategy guided by imaging versus routine invasive strategy in elderly patients with ischemia. Am Heart J. Published 23 October 2024. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →