Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesCohort study

RBM20 Truncating Variants and Human Cardiomyopathy

JAMA CardiolPublished

  • Cohort study
  • genome-first biobanks (UK Biobank, All of Us)
  • retrospective international registry

Authors' conclusion

This study found that RBM20 variants contributed to arrhythmogenic DCM phenotypes but conferred reduced lifetime disease penetrance compared to TTNtvs and milder disease severity alone than P/LP RBM20 variants.

Study context

Population
Participants in UK Biobank and All of Us, and patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and RBM20 variants at international centres of excellence for genetic heart diseaseUK Biobank (UKB) 4249
Exposure
RBM20 truncating variants vs P/LP RBM20 variants, VUS in RBM20 and TTNtvs
Outcome
Major ventricular arrhythmias, end-stage HF and HF hospitalization

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Hazard ratio (95% CI)P value
RBM20 variants vs TTNtvslifetime incidence of cardiomyopathy, HF or major ventricular arrhythmia, genome-first biobanks
0.55(0.36–0.84)
P < 0.001
RBM20tvs vs P/LP RBM20sex-adjusted lifetime hazard, patients with DCM
0.13(0.03–0.56)
P = 0.01

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeRBM20tvsP/LP RBM20TTNtvsP value
Age at presentation to referral centres (DCM)mean 53 (SD 10) yearsmean 34 (SD 18) yearsNot reported in the abstractP < 0.001
Family history of sudden cardiac arrest (DCM) · 2 of 10 vs 11 of 1720%65%Not reported in the abstractP = 0.046
Family history of cardiomyopathy (DCM) · 2 of 10 vs 14 of 1820%78%Not reported in the abstractP < 0.001

Etiologic fraction of RBM20 variants in arrhythmogenic DCM

Etiologic fraction
0.53 (95% CI, 0.32-0.67; P < .001)

Original publication

RBM20 Truncating Variants and Human Cardiomyopathy. JAMA Cardiol. Published 1 May 2026. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2026.0401

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it