Valvular & structural heart disease

Representativeness of surgical controls in aortic valve replacement trials: comparison with routine surgical cohorts

HeartPublished Systematic literature review with meta-analyses of pooled data and reconstructed Kaplan-Meier survival analyses

Authors' conclusion

Compared with typical SAVR patients treated in routine practice, RCT SAVR patients experienced higher complication rates and worse long-term survival, despite similar or lower surgical risk scores. These findings question the external validity of SAVR versus TAVI trials.

Study context

Population
Low-risk or intermediate-risk patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and SAVR, and in routine clinical practiceSAVR patients in 19 studies (9 RCTs and 10 studies describing routine clinical practice) · RCTs 9 · studies describing routine clinical practice 10
Participants
74,797 participants
Comparison
Patient characteristics, early outcomes and 5-year survival compared between RCT SAVR cohorts and those treated in routine clinical practice settings
Outcome
Early mortality
Methodological detailsRCTs and large prospective studies (n≥500 SAVR patients), low-risk or intermediate-risk patients since 2010, stratification by risk category
  • RCTs and large prospective studies (n≥500 SAVR patients)
  • Low-risk or intermediate-risk patients since 2010
  • Stratification by risk category

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

  • Comparable early mortality in routine clinical practice vs RCT SAVR patients

Further pooled results

OutcomeHR (95% CI)
Overall survival · 5 years0.64 (0.55–0.75)
  • Overall survival: low-risk patients; survival higher in routine clinical practice

Periprocedural complications (stroke, pacemaker implantation, myocardial infarction)

Fewer periprocedural complications in routine clinical practice, including lower rates of stroke, pacemaker implantation and myocardial infarction

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Representativeness of surgical controls in aortic valve replacement trials: comparison with routine surgical cohorts. Heart. Published 8 July 2025. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2025-326162

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.