Valvular & structural heart disease

Updated 5-year outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low- to intermediate-surgical risk

HeartPublished systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors' conclusion

In this meta-analysis of RCTs, TAVI resulted in a clinically relevant increase in all-cause mortality, and a high probability of an increased risk of stroke, at 5 years of follow-up in low-risk to intermediate-risk patients, when compared to SAVR.

Study context

Population
Patients with severe aortic stenosis at low- to intermediate-surgical risk, in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with at least 5-year follow-upTAVI 3,704 · SAVR 3,545
Participants
7,249 patients · 6 RCTs
Comparison
TAVI versus SAVR
  • TAVIn = 3,704
  • SAVRn = 3,545reference
Outcome
All-cause mortality
Follow-up
5 years
Methodological detailsBayesian hierarchical design, time-to-event data reconstructed, minimally informative priors
  • Bayesian hierarchical design
  • Time-to-event data reconstructed
  • Minimally informative priors

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

All-cause mortality
TAVI vs SAVREstimateP value
Heterogeneity τ 2 =0; 99.3% posterior probability that SAVR is superior to TAVI
median RR 1.12(95% CrI 1.02–1.22)
Conventional frequentist random-effects model
RR 1.13(95% CI 1.05–1.22)
P = 0.001
Conventional frequentist fixed-effects model
RR 1.12(95% CI 1.03–1.23)
P = 0.011

Further pooled results

OutcomeMedian RR (95% CrI)
Stroke · 5 years1.13 (0.93–1.39)
  • Stroke: heterogeneity τ 2 =0.04; 88.0% posterior probability that SAVR outperformed TAVI

Interaction effect of surgical risk category

No evidence for an interaction effect of surgical risk category
P = 0.470

Original publication

Updated 5-year outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low- to intermediate-surgical risk. Heart. Published 11 February 2026. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2025-327092

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.